The Unfriendly Atheist

themysteryoffaith:

Catholics Do Not Believe:

  • That the Pope is God and can do no wrong;
  • That anybody or anything may be worshiped or adored besides the True God;
  • That the Blessed Virgin is equal to God;
  • That images may be worshiped;
  • That indulgences give permission to commit sin;
  • That a Mass can be bought;
  • That forgiveness of sin can be bought;
  • That sin can be forgiven without true sorrow;
  • That scapulars, medals, crucifixes, and other sacramentals can give graces without proper dispositions on the part of the user;
  • That non-Catholics will all be damned;
  • That all Catholics will go to heaven;
  • That the Bible is the only rule of faith;
  • That anybody may interpret the Bible;
  • That Our Lord Jesus Christ established many Churches;
  • That outward piety is profitable without charity of the spirit;
  • That all religions are the same.

But they do believe:

  • That proclamations from the Vatican that are infallible are unable to be changed later
  • In a weird definition of “worship” that excludes the BVM + saints not by action but by definition only 
  • That indulgences are a get-out-of-purgatory-free card, which does translate into permission for venial sin in practical effects
  • That the blessings of a Mass can be directed towards a certain person or cause with money
  • That donation to certain causes can be bought, which can translate into indulgences
  • ACTUALLY the effects of venial sin vanish upon receiving communion
  • That these magical items will work only when someone already believes they work, which is awfully fuckin’ suspicious
  • That exposure to Catholicism and consequential rejection of it is automatic damnation
  • That some things in the Bible are an absolute rule of faith, but others not
  • That you’re supposed to interpret areas of the Bible by yourself… except when your interpretation doesn’t align with the Church. Which makes it rather pointless
  • Uh, I wonder what happened to the Coptic, Byzantine, etc churches and their respective popes
  • That you still need to pray in public and in large numbers and be as obvious and obnoxious as possible
  • That all religions are samely wrong
“Your holiness, this priest keeps touching and harassing me.”
“Poor son, you see, I will protect you.”

“Your holiness, this priest keeps touching and harassing me.”

“Poor son, you see, I will protect you.”


Now it all makes sense

Now it all makes sense

Not trying to be a jerk. Just needing some answers.

ezacek:

Need to get something off my chest here:

I was born and raised Catholic.  I sang in the choir, went to catechism, read a bible, the whole shebang.  My parents were (and are) wonderful, amazing, loving people who only want the best for their kids.  I have no complaints about my upbringing.  But I have this horrible, nagging list of questions that just won’t leave me alone.  

Why does the pope sit in a golden throne and then tell impoverished people in Mexico to stop worshiping money?

Why was God so present in people’s lives in biblical times (at least once per generation) but not now?  Why’d he ditch us?

I’ll never get past the Noah’s ark story.  So, there was an entire population of people that God just didn’t like, so he killed everyone but Noah and his family?  By DROWNING THEM?  That’s one of the cruelest things I’ve ever heard.  Also that means that some people are beyond redemption—a blatant contradiction to everything I’ve been told by any Christian.

According to the Bible, fetuses aren’t actually people.  They’re in the same subcategory as slaves, who at the time, weren’t considered people.  Where does the “life begins at conception” thing come from?  (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-bibleforbids.htm)

Why are churches and cathedrals so elaborate?  Why not take that money and give it to the poor like Jesus suggested?

How does child molestation keep happening?  Why why why does the church not stop everything to get rid of priests who are messing up these children for life?

Some guy wandered in the desert for 40 days so now we don’t eat fish on Fridays.  Uhhh?

“Hey Eve.  Here’s the coolest apple tree in all of the garden, but you can’t have any.”  Why?  Why would a purportedly all-loving God be such a jerk?

I hear people claiming that everything that happens is God’s will, but the same people will claim that bad things happen because Satan caused them to.  So what is it?

Pretty sure homosexuality is only banned because it doesn’t result in babies, which means fewer babies to indoctrinate. 

What makes the Catholic church better than any cult?  It starts teaching its children when they’re too young to pick what to believe for themselves.  

How did I believe this stuff without question?  Why do people not encourage each other to question?  

If “intelligent design” is taught to my children someday, I’m going to demand that it be the story of creation as told by the Ancient Greeks.  

indians-vs-cowboys:

March 22nd, 2012, in downtown Leon in the Mexican state of Guanajuato, people protested against the imminent three-day visit of Pope Benedict XVI. The protest was staged to defend the country’s secular state and against the promotion of religion in public schools, local media reported. (Photo REUTERS/Tomas Bravo)

indians-vs-cowboys:

March 22nd, 2012, in downtown Leon in the Mexican state of Guanajuato, people protested against the imminent three-day visit of Pope Benedict XVI. The protest was staged to defend the country’s secular state and against the promotion of religion in public schools, local media reported. (Photo REUTERS/Tomas Bravo)

atheistme:

Uhoh..

“So about that murdering my followers and eradicating my religion thing…”

atheistme:

Uhoh..

“So about that murdering my followers and eradicating my religion thing…”

‘Knights Templar’ Drug Cartel Calls For Truce During Pope’s Visit to Mexico

shanksinatra:

well this is certainly …interesting, news.

Reports the AFP via the Herald Sun:

The Knights Templar drug cartel is calling a short truce — but only to welcome Pope Benedict XVI to Mexico. They did put up signs announcing this,” a Guanajuato state government source told AFP privately on Sunday.

The Knights Templar are holding off on all violent action, we are not killers, welcome to the Pope,” the official said paraphrasing one of the signs put up in the town of Irapuato, Guanajuato state. The signs were seen in at least seven towns statewide.

The Pope arrives March 23 in Leon, in the neighbouring state of Michoacan, where the Knights Templar were founded. President Felipe Calderon has launched a military crackdown against the cartels battling it out for control of the lucrative drug trade, in which some 50,000 Mexicans have lost their lives since 2006.

How polite

Religious Liberty Cry Fails to Rally Catholics

helvetebrann:

The Catholic bishops have stepped up their fight with the Obama White House over the birth control insurance coverage mandate, but a new survey shows their efforts to cast this as a religious liberty battle don’t fly with most Catholics or with the general public.

Wednesday, the top committee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement saying it would keep talking to the administration but plans to amend the mandate’s application to religious-affilated schools, hospitals and charities are unresolved, “unspecified and dubious.”

The conference is “strongly unified and intensely focused in its opposition to the various threats to religious freedom in our day,” the statement says.

They haven’t succeeded in framing the public argument, according to the Public Religion Research Institute. In a survey released today, 56% overall, including six in 10 Catholics, said they do not see religious liberty under attack.

This matches up with PRRI’s February poll that found 55% of Americans, including 58% of Catholics, agree that “employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception and birth control at no cost.”

The Catholic Church is free to preach whatever it wants.  But they are not free to accept public money and then expect the right to force their beliefs on others who work for them, who may or may not be Catholic and may or may not follow that particular Catholic belief.

Wouldn’t it be nice if they could afford something to eat

Wouldn’t it be nice if they could afford something to eat


phadz:
fuckyeahdementia:
every sperm is good
every sperm is needed

phadz:

fuckyeahdementia:

every sperm is good

every sperm is needed

jakeenglishswaifu:

sinidentidades:

Catholics lash out at ‘vulgar’ Nicki Minaj Grammy show
Catholic bishops have finally found someone to be more upset with than President Barack Obama.
In a statement issued Monday afternoon, The Catholic League condemned hip-hop artist Nicki Minaj for her controversial performance at the Grammy Awards over the weekend.
Minaj staged a mock exorcism while performing her song “Roman Holiday.” She also appeared on the Grammy red carpet with a man dressed up as a Catholic bishop beside her while wearing attire resembling fictional character Red Riding Hood.
Catholic League president Bill Donahueexpressed his disapproval over the performance in a statement.
“Perhaps the most vulgar part was the sexual statement that showed a scantily clad female dancer stretching backwards while an altar boy knelt between her legs in prayer,” he said. “Finally, ‘Come All Ye Faithful’ was sung while a man posing as a bishop walked on stage; Minaj was shown levitating.”
He added: “It’s bad enough that Catholics have to fight for their rights vis-à-vis a hostile administration in Washington without also having to fend off attacks in the entertainment industry. The net effect, however, will only embolden Catholics, as well as their friends in other faith communities.”
Minaj has yet to comment on the Catholic League’s statement.

catholics are always whining about something gooosssh

jakeenglishswaifu:

sinidentidades:

Catholics lash out at ‘vulgar’ Nicki Minaj Grammy show

Catholic bishops have finally found someone to be more upset with than President Barack Obama.

In a statement issued Monday afternoon, The Catholic League condemned hip-hop artist Nicki Minaj for her controversial performance at the Grammy Awards over the weekend.

Minaj staged a mock exorcism while performing her song “Roman Holiday.” She also appeared on the Grammy red carpet with a man dressed up as a Catholic bishop beside her while wearing attire resembling fictional character Red Riding Hood.

Catholic League president Bill Donahueexpressed his disapproval over the performance in a statement.

“Perhaps the most vulgar part was the sexual statement that showed a scantily clad female dancer stretching backwards while an altar boy knelt between her legs in prayer,” he said. “Finally, ‘Come All Ye Faithful’ was sung while a man posing as a bishop walked on stage; Minaj was shown levitating.”

He added: “It’s bad enough that Catholics have to fight for their rights vis-à-vis a hostile administration in Washington without also having to fend off attacks in the entertainment industry. The net effect, however, will only embolden Catholics, as well as their friends in other faith communities.”

Minaj has yet to comment on the Catholic League’s statement.

catholics are always whining about something gooosssh

Open Letter To All Porn Spammers on the Catholic Tag

acatholicvibe:

Posting porn on the Catholic tag and sending hate filled messages to Catholics on Tumblr will never have the effect you hope for.

Your actions will not impede us from practicing our faith in the manner we choose.

Your actions will never stop us from acknowledging our love for Jesus Christ.

Your actions will not stop us from expressing our love for the Catholic Church.

Your actions do bring us closer together as a Catholic community here on Tumblr, and this makes us stronger.

We are praying for you. We are dealing with your hate, pornography and disrespect with prayer and forgiveness; it’s what we as Christians are called to do.

wat

My religion forbids dumbass white men from controlling my body. STOP OPPRESSING MY BELIEFS!

thepoliticalpartygirl:

Where’s my religious freedom?

From Alternet. 

Excerpt:

Until the condom, the diaphragm, the Pill, the IUD, and all the subsequent variants of hormonal fertility control came along, anatomy really was destiny — and all of the world’s societies were organized around that central fact. Women were born to bear children; they had no other life options. With a few rebellious or well-born exceptions (and a few outlier cultures that somehow found their way to a more equal footing), the vast majority of women who’ve ever lived on this planet were tied to home, dependent on men, and subject to all kinds of religious and cultural restrictions designed to guarantee that they bore the right kids to the right man at the right time — even if that meant effectively jailing them at home.

Our biology reduced us to a kind of chattel, subject to strictures that owed more to property law than the more rights-based laws that applied to men. Becoming literate or mastering a trade or participating in public life wasn’t unheard-of; but unlike the men, the world’s women have always had to fit those extras in around their primary duty to their children and husband — and have usually paid a very stiff price if it was thought that those duties were being neglected.

Men, in return, thrived. The ego candy they feasted on by virtue of automatically outranking half the world’s population was only the start of it. They got full economic and social control over our bodies, our labor, our affections, and our futures. They got to make the rules, name the gods we would worship, and dictate the terms we would live under. In most cultures, they had the right to sex on demand within the marriage, and also to break their marriage vows with impunity — a luxury that would get women banished or killed. As long as pregnancy remained the defining fact of our lives, they got to run the whole show. The world was their party, and they had a fabulous time. 

Thousands of generations of men and women have lived under some variant of this order — some variations more benevolent, some more brutal, but all similar enough in form and intention — in all times and places, going back to where our memory of time ends. Look at it this way, and you get a striking perspective on just how world-changing it was when, within the span of just a few short decades in the middle of the 20th century, all of that suddenly ended. For the first time in human history, new technologies made fertility a conscious choice for an ever-growing number of the planet’s females. And that, in turn, changed everything else.

With that one essential choice came the possibility, for the first time, to make a vast range of other choices for ourselves that were simply never within reach before. We could choose to delay childbearing and limit the number of children we raise; and that, in turn, freed up time and energy to explore the world beyond the home. We could refuse to marry or have babies at all, and pursue our other passions instead. Contraception was the single necessary key that opened the door to the whole new universe of activities that had always been zealously monopolized by the men — education, the trades, the arts, government, travel, spiritual and cultural leadership, and even (eventually) war making. 

That one fact, that one technological shift, is now rocking the foundations of every culture on the planet — and will keep rocking it for a very long time to come. It is, over time, bringing a louder and prouder female voice into the running of the world’s affairs at every level, creating new conversations and new priorities in areas where the men long ago thought things were settled and understood. It’s bending our understanding of what sex is about, and when and with whom we can have it — a wrinkle that created new frontiers for gay folk as well. It may well prove to the be the one breakthrough most responsible for the survival of the human race, and the future viability of the planet.

But perhaps most critically for us right now: mass-produced, affordable, reliable contraception has shredded the ages-old social contracts between men and women, and is forcing us all (willing or not) into wholesale re-negotiations on a raft of new ones.

And, frankly, while some men have embraced this new order— perhaps seeing in it the potential to open up some interesting new choices for them, too — a global majority is increasingly confused, enraged, and terrified by it. They never wanted to be at this table in the first place, and they’re furious to even find themselves being forced to have this conversation at all. 

It was never meant to happen. It never should have happened. And they’re doing their damndest to put a stop to it all, right now, and make it go away.

It’s this rage that’s driving the Catholic bishops into a frenzied donnybrook fight against contraception — despite the very real possibility that this fight could, in the end, damage their church even more fatally than the molestation scandal did.  As the keepers of a 2000-year-old enterprise — one of the oldest continuously-operating organizations on the planet, in fact — they take the very long view. And they understand, better than most of us, just how unprecedented this development is in the grand sweep of history, and the serious threat it poses to everything their church has stood for going back to antiquity. (Including, very much, the more recent doctrine of papal infallability.)

That same frantic panic over the loss of the ancient bargain also lies that the core of the worldwide rash of fundamentalist religions. Modern industrial economies have undermined the authority of men both in the public sphere and in the private realms; and since they’re limited in how far they can challenge it in the external world, they’ve turned women’s bodies into the symbolic battlefield on which their anxieties over this play out. Drill down to the very deepest center of any of these movements, and you’ll find men who are experiencing this change as a kind of personal annihilation, a loss of masculine identity so deep that they are literally interpreting it as the end of the world. (The first rule of understanding apocalyptic movements is this: If someone tells you the world is ending, believe them. Because for them, it probably is.)

They are, above everything else, desperate to get their women back under firm control. And in their minds, things will not be right again until they’re assured that the girls are locked up even more tightly, so they will never, ever get away like that again.

lol

lol