Just to clarify, this is a Prolifer showing the mentality of the Prochoice movement.
fixed it for you
A homosexual is effectively saying “I can go ahead and have a sexual relationship without including women, without having the consent of a woman.” Homosexuality seems to be all about reducing the power and status of women- of making them unnecessary. I think, in spirit and effect, it is almost akin to rape.
I’m so done right now >:(
Were that be true
Pregnancy is NOT ABOUT YOU!
It’s about religious beliefs you don’t belong to!
THAT BABY IS…say it with me, AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PERSON!!
Well, actually, legally, it isn’t a person.
Medically, it’s an entirely different existence, but so the bacteria living in your digestive tract.
Yep they’re in YOUR body, but you CHOSE to put them there!
Yep! Went to K Mart and picked ‘em out.
If you hadn’t had sex, that human being would not be growing, understand?
HOW IS BABBY FORMED
WHY GIRL NOT GET PRAGNANT ALL TIME
STILL STONE AGE
So why in the world are you now complaining that if abortion was illegal you would have no choice?? Um…YOU CHOSE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE!! YOU chose WHO you would have sex with!
See, if you would have just gayed it up, you’d be fine right now.
Homosexuality is always the solution.
Nobody made that decision for you!! and don’t come to me saying, ’ what about the girls who are raped?’ They only make up less than 1% of all abortions!
Abortions as a result of rape are REPORTED as 1%.
That figure doesn’t include:
- people whose religion coerced them into not using contraception
- people whose religion coerced them into having specifically procreative sex
- people who have been brainwashed by rampant misogyny into doing whatever their partner wants
- people who have limited access to contraceptives thanks to fuckheads like OP
Yes, look it up this is a fact! I’m sure you went to school so you learned that sex causes what??
Idiotic Christians who can’t seem to fathom a world where humanity can operate on a super-animal level?
Hmmm….PREGNANCY!
Sweetie, nobody has ever gotten pregnant as a result of my fucking. That’s not how it works. Sex = pregnancy isn’t reality, it’s religion.
If you would be soo mad about your OWN child growing in your uterus then you should NOT have made one!
So put the fuckin’ fetus kit back on the shelf, goddamnit Ethel! You’ve made enough of those!
That child is COMPLETELY innocent,
Actually. If it were able to be legally responsible for anything (being a legal person, which it isn’t), it would be GUILTY of trespass, theft, and a host (heh) of other issues.
and having abortion is not about YOUR body,
It’s about the religion of someone else. Duh.
it’s involving a totally seperate person,
The cosmic Jewish zombie lich god
whom YOU are killing!
I hope you’ve never menstruated or fapped.
Women, you have LOTS of choices when it comes to YOUR body,
Such as homosexuality obv
but that baby is not one because he/she is NOT YOU.
Legally, and medically, it is.
I know this will make people mad, I DON’T CARE it needs to be said.
End rant.
“I know this will make people mad” < said whenever someone is about to spout a bunch of lies and nonsense for propaganda purposes
From LifeSiteNews.com:
COLUMBUS, Ohio, April 12, 2012 – Seminarians from the only Pontifical College in the U.S. have an awe-inspiring approach for confronting abortion head-on. Dressed in full regalia of a black cassock, a traditional red sash, and armed with a rosary, the seminarians descend in a powerful show of force every Saturday on a local abortion facility to confront with prayer what the seminary’s rector calls the “poison of abortion.”
Father James Wehner, rector of the Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, says he believes that seminarians need to “see visibly the forces of evil at work, and respond with an act of faith in which prayer becomes the greater force.”
“American culture is a blessing, but it is also poisoned,” he said. “The clergy, particularly priests, need to be able to confront that poison, not run away and hide from it. That means we have to confront it head-on.”
Imagine if they spent every Saturday running a free child care facility, or volunteering at a women’s shelter, or spending time with kids in the foster care system. Imagine if they stood like this outside their congressional rep’s office, demanding accountability for childhood disease and poverty. Imagine if they cared about people who were already born, instead of being judgmental of people exercising their legal and medical right.
-Jess
You know your catholic when your watching Star Wars and when they say “may the force be with you” you respond with “and also with you”
I still do this lol
“Wisconsin is one of 37 states with a fetal homicide law, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Under the 1998 law, anyone who attacks a pregnant woman and injures or kills her fetus could face life in prison.”
if she had gotten an abortion that same day they’d be calling it a “choice” not a murder. I’m dizzy with confusion right now.
I’m guessing you’re one of the shining stars who can’t tell the difference between torture and S&M, eating and force-feeding, rape and sex, donation and theft…
As if adolescence wasn’t already hard enough, LGBT students in Louisiana have a new reason to fear for their existence.
In a 5-1 vote on Thursday, a state Senate committee overwhelmingly approved bill 217, which if passed into law would give publically funded charter schools the right to refuse to admit students based on sexual orientation, among other irrational and vile reasons such as English language skills.
The Advocate (not the LGBT publication of the same name) reports:
“State Sen. A.G. Crowe [pictured left], R-Slidell, said his bill is designed to ensure that executive branch agencies and local governments stop including bans on discrimination against characteristics not listed in state law as a condition for private companies to do business with their agencies… On the other side, state Sen. Ed Murray, the only “no” in the 5-1 vote by the Senate Labor and Industrial Relations committee, said the possibility of SB217 becoming law and negating the anti-discriminatory prohibitions in charter school contracts is “really scary.”
Though Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal refused to comment on the matter, his press secretary, Frank Collins, wrote in an email (or rather, his Tea Party propaganda machine): “We’re against discrimination, but we don’t believe in special protections or rights.”
FEMEN on facebook reports:
April 10 at 10:00 AM 5 beauties of FEMEN imprisoned themselves in the bell tower of Saint Sophia Cathedral. By adopting a canonical form, the activists hit all the bells and launched a 7-meter long banner with the slogan “STOP”. The alarm alerted the eternal city to the gangster conspiracy of church and state, which aims to impose a government on the control of the sacred feminine gift of procreation. Signified whoring was reflected in the bill number 10 170 on deprivation of women’s right to abortion.
Lila Rose, heroine of the pro-life movement, has written a disastrously nonsensical article bemoaning the lack of pro-life “feminist” voices in the abortion debate today.
Women are now, as various cultural liberals have put it, “facing sexual McCarthyism” from “conservative cavemen” who want to return to the “Dark Ages.”
But women are not a monolith. And there is a growing group of passionate young women who are transforming what it means to be a woman. Allow me to introduce them to you. We are women who reject both the anti-male feminism of the 1960s and the “girls gone wild” mentality that’s pervasive today.
We are women for whom the idea of artificial birth control as “preventive care” is deeply insulting.
We are women who view the intentional killing of children not as a constitutional right, a matter of privacy or a necessary evil but, rather, as profoundly anti-woman and the antithesis of love.
We are women whose lives contradict the idea of an inevitable clash between religious liberty and women’s health. We are women who believe that something precious is lost when fertility is intentionally excluded from marriage, a sacred bond and a total giving of each spouse to the other.
We are women who believe that sex and pregnancy aren’t just health issues; they are also inextricably linked with family, morals, faith and values. And we are women who love everything about being a woman, including being mothers. We have noticed that the rise in the availability and use of cheap birth control coincided with increases in the rates of sex addiction, divorce, unmarried childbearing and abortion.
We have also noticed that while contraceptives and legal abortion promised to eliminate the exploitative attitude of men toward women, they have had the opposite effect.
Unless you’re as brainwashed as Ms. Rose is, or unless you’ve had the dubious pleasure of encountering these “feminists” before, you’re probably completely baffled by the nonsense you’ve just read.
Let me explain: These religious “feminists” believe that women naturally want to be reproducing in un-hygenic numbers, and that women are given a truly Catholic love for children by god. So abortion becomes anti-feminist because it takes away that natural feminine tendency towards motherhood.
Really, when you think about it, it’s not that surprising that Rose is incredibly illogical, when she believes that the magical cosmic Jewish/non-Jewish zombie deity makes women love babies and hate sex because of talking snakes and magical apples and so on.
The entire article is pretty lulzy:
We continued shaking our heads when we heard Rush Limbaugh’s misogynistic remarks about Fluke. Perhaps most revealing was his suggestion that she be required to perform in sex videos in return for free contraceptives.
Said in jest? Probably. But it was a telling reminder that the surest way for a young woman to attain stardom is by performing in and releasing pornography.
What an awkward way to shove in an anti-pornography view.
Her closing statement:
We don’t wish to take the country back in time; rather, we aspire to move it forward, beyond a time when women are treated as objects and pitted against their children and their religious institutions — and toward a time when truly emancipated women embrace their intrinsic dignity and, with it, their authentic womanhood.
Wow. “Authentic womanhood.” You don’t have to be a violently indoctrinated Catholic to know what that means.
Children
You can’t use a child’s ability to comprehend as justification for anything.
You can’t use it to condemn slavery, murder, rape, same-sex unions, hatred, nothing.
Children are taught these things.
-
“Is slavery bad? Yes. Why? Because a child once told me it was bad.”
“Is hating someone okay? Yes. Why? Because a child once told me it was okay”
-
Neither of those arguments are valid.
Whether or not you’re correct or incorrect is not dependent upon whether or not a child gives you approval.
-
Even if I didn’t disagree with same-sex unions, I would still tell you to get a better argument. Just because that argument definitely hurts your case.
I (being pro-life) would never try to argue that abortion is bad because a child agreed with me. I would need a much better argument.
-
-
Basstrip, I have two hobbies. Thank you!
Thanks for comparing equal rights for gays to slavery. Personally, I really appreciate that you think that laws designed to keep us safe and not dead, discriminated against, etc are equivalent to teaching children to support human trafficking.
That being said, your comprehension of the argument is flawless. Rather than realizing that it’s a response to a single argument and not the basis of an argument itself, you’ve decided that it’s an argument for legitimatizing something which apparently is as bad as rape, murder, and slavery.
I mean, it’s not like that conclusion would be the logical one. The argument mimics the situation and language of the one it is responding to. As the original claim states that queer rights are bad because (among other reasons) parents shouldn’t have to “confuse” their children with others’ equality, it seems reasonable that a response to that particular fucking argument would include how children are not confused by homosexuality.
HOLY SHIT. LOGIC. WHAT IS THIS SORCERY? BURN IT AT THE STAKE.
All that in itself, your comparison of queer rights to slavery, murder, and rape is odious and absolute nonsense. Either you’re being facetious and you’re just employing propaganda tactics, or you’re being serious and you actually think that giving people equality is the same thing as rape, murder, and slavery.
Given that you’re Catholic, I know you don’t believe in the latter. Apparently, then, you just included the examples of things that people commonly react strongly against for propaganda purposes.
In that case, I say, try harder next time. You’re a Catholic. I know you can do better.
Pro-Choice Logic.
“THIS IS MY UTERUS.”
(except when paying for abortions, pap smears, contraception, cancer screenings, std screenings) The cost for upkeep is all YOURS!
I hope you’ve never driven on public roads, gone to public schools, eaten food made affordable with federal subsidies, used a public hospital’s services, taken advantage of federal police or fire services, or sent mail.
By the blogger lesbianapdfighter
I was walking down a bus stop and I happened to stumble upon a man reading the Herald Sun with the front headline “Church Declares War On Gay Marriage”, so as this is a topic that concerns me, I decided to take a trip down to the newsagents and pick up a copy, find a nice cafe and then sit down with my hot chocolate to read it. I was appalled and dumbfounded at the same time;
“Church leaders will urge Victoria’s million-plus Catholics to campaign against gay marriage, saying it would undermine family life and damage society.” Seriously? And what made them think that if homosexuals were allowed the fundamental right to marry just like our heterosexual counter parts already can that it would some how weaken the traditional family? Well, Catholic Church, I’m sure after same sex marriage is legalised that there will still be traditional families living together and with nothing changed. So, if some of my married straight friends attended my wedding with my partner, would they eventually start arguing more and then get a divorce?
“Without this there would be no human beings and no future,” the letter says.” Is this a parody or an sad, isolated person who has no access to any type of media and just doesn’t go out? The bigoted individual who wrote this has obviously has never heard of a sperm bank and/or lives in his little world in a box thinking that there are no gay couples who want to have kids when there are and I am included in that percentage. Even without marriage there are still same sex couples who make families together, so the only thing that is really going to change, is that same sex couples and families will be as legally recognised as straight families and will have the same benefits. Calm down, no one is forcing you to marry a man.
“Bringing new human life into the world is founded on the loving union in difference of male and female. Children are best nurtured by a mother and father.” You really do live in a small box where you preach that it’s best to have a male and female, don’t you Catholic Church? Do you even a have the facts to back up your argument in which doesn’t include the bible?
“… researchers compared adolescents from carefully matched families headed by female couples and those headed by heterosexual couples and found no differences on all measures of adjustment and well-being, including self-esteem, anxiety, grade averages, reported substance abuse, delinquency, and peer victimisation.” Researchers did find a difference in how connected the children felt to people at school, whereby children with same-sex parents showed a greater connection.” – Page 9, paragraph 2 of The Australian Phycological Society: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families.
There was a study done by the Australian Phycological Society and according to this study, the children in same-sex families were no different (and in some cases better off) than in a opposite-sex family.
“Since the 1970s, it has become increasingly clear that it is family processes (such as the quality of parenting, the psychosocial well-being of parents, the quality of and satisfaction with relationships within the family, and the level of co-operation and harmony between parents) that contribute to determining children’s well-being and ‘outcomes’, rather than family structures…” - Page 8, paragraph 3 of The Australian Phycological Society: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families.
Regardless of if the parents have the same genitals in under their clothing or not, this will not determine the child’s outcome, what does determine is the levels of care, warmth, love, trust, social connection and support, so if these qualities exist in high levels, the outcome of the children’s mental health will be no be poor.
”Society had not collapsed in countries such as Canada and Spain where marriage equality had been achieved, she said.” What makes these countries any more different than us? Only the fact that they have legalised same sex marriage which grants them the same rights as opposite sex couples. Why would legalising same sex marriage make us collapse when many other countries have not collapsed, what is different?
“Marriage equality supporters have described the church’s campaign as “alarmist” and rejected claims gay marriage would undermine family life or damage society.” Even without the facts, people can still confidently say that the legalisation of same-sex marriages will not weaken any family, because how can myself and my partner’s future marriage possibly weaken a single straight marriage? The legalisation will not affect the current rights of heterosexual marriage occupants in anyway, nor will it prevent them from marrying one another in the future.
“The church’s push was not about a lack of respect for people who identify as gay and lesbian, who should be treated with respect and dignity, he said.” Well of course they’re not trying to disrespect us, but instead they are trying to influence the law to force everyone else live by their morals which means LGBT people are second class citizens and do not deserve to be treated equally just because they are against a two-thousand year or more religious text which also says that they have to allow free will.
To conclude this, if you don’t like same-sex marriage, then don’t marry someone of the same sex, it’s that simple. A group of people should not have to live like second class citizens just because it goes against your belief system, if you feel you need to live by your morals, then do so, don’t make it law for everyone else to follow. You don’t see us composing letters of hate to ban all praying just because it goes against our moral code, live and let live.
